Buddhist Meditation
Systematic and Practical

 

CW35

Chapter IX

THE FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF MINDFULNESS: A GOOD BRIDGE TO MAHAYANA MEDITATION

 

A Talk by the Buddhist Yogi

C. M. CHEN

 

Written Down by

REVEREND B. KANTIPALO

 

First Published in 1967


 

 

HOMAGE TO JE TSONG-KHAPA, THE FOUR AGAMAS,

AND THE FIVE HUNDRED ARHATS

 

Chapter IX

 

THE FOUR FOUNDATIONS OF MINDFULNESS:

A GOOD BRIDGE TO MAHAYANA MEDITATION

 

Mr. Chen had heard of the writer's intention to visit Darjeeling for a few days at the end of Vassa (the monsoon retreat for Buddhist monks), and was afraid he might not return. He was reassured when he heard that nothing within our control would interfere with the book's completion. As this book is unique in content, and as hearer and writer have both found these explanations interesting and helpful, so it must be finished so that others may also benefit and walk further on the way.

 

Bhante remarked that the writer's notebook, quite a thick one, was now near its end and Mr. Chen promised many more pages of notes yet. "We are only on Chapter Nine," he said, "and there are at least six or seven to follow."

 

A. The Homage

 

To begin with, our homage is the same as in the last chapter, for the subject matter here is also basically of the Hinayana, although we shall see the correspondences with various doctrines of the Great and Diamond Ways . The homage thus need not be described again.

 

B. Two Purposes for Samapatti

 

The positive purpose is to attain enlightenment. This, however, is in the position of consequence, so for us unenlightened worldlings there is no need to talk much about it. We are in the position of cause, so for us the negative purpose is the most important: that is, to rid ourselves of obstacles. When this is done, positive results will automatically appear. I have made a list to illustrate the hindrances:

 

Cause

Hindrances

Five dull drivers

Doubts arising from the passions

Doubts about practice

Egoism of person

(klesavarana)

Five sharp drivers

Doubts about the truth

Doubts about view

Egoism of dharmas

(Jneyavarana)

 

 


 

H.—Hinayana
M.—Mahayana
Y.T.—Yogic Tantra
A.T.—Anuttara Tantra

 


We have already talked in the last chapter about the five poisons, or the five dull drivers, as they are called here, which produce the klesavarana, upon which the view of the personal ego is based. The first line of this list, then, has been described. The second line will be the subject of this chapter, where the samapatti of the four mindfulnesses will be the medicine prescribed for the five sharp drivers, the veil of knowledge, and the attachment to the view that the dharmas have "ego." (See also the diagram showing the four mindfulness meditations and their correspondences in the other yanas.)

 

The five meditations of the last chapter and the four of this one are only to get rid of these factors driving us on, the gross or dull ones and the more subtle sharp ones. Although in both chapters only nine meditations are described, still they are more or less sufficient to get rid of these hindrances, which is our purpose, and we shall find upon examination that all the other meditations are included in them.

 

C. A Notice on the Five Sharp Drivers

 

In the Idealist School these are listed and described by Xuan Zang in his essay on Consciousness-only. They are also found in the Hinayana Abhidharmakosa by Vasubandhu. It is important to understand them, for if we do, then these enemies to our enlightenment may be destroyed.

 

1. Satkayadrstithe view of "my" of the body and not knowing that it is really a mixture of the five aggregates (the skandhas—form, feeling, perception, habitual tendencies, and consciousness). This is viewing what is merely a changing continuity as being "really my body," and upon this, building the further idea of "myself." Things which surround "my body" are then thought of as "mine," whereas in fact there is no owner of them. From the union of the ideas of "I" and "mine" comes the false view of "myself."

 

2. Antagraha—extreme or one-sided views. Since most people at first take hold of the ideas of "I" and "mine," so when they come to think about death, their speculations veer to one of two extremes. Either they suppose that after dying, they cease to exist (the view of annihilation and ordinary materialists), or they believe that though the body has died, something subtle remains, some spirit, some soul belonging to "me" somehow goes on (this is taught in all religions except Buddhism). In this way, such people wander from one side to another, lost among a maze of one-sided views.

 

3. Mithya—false view. This means not recognizing the law of cause and effect (in Buddhism this is better called "dependent origination" or "conditioned co-production"), which is the Buddha's teaching on the operations of karma. If one thinks that actions produce no results, then one may do evil without any fear and not expect any reward from doing good actions. All these five sharp drivers are false views, but this one is the falsest among them.

 

4. Drstiparamarsa—stubborn, perverted views, taking inferior things as superior or vice versa. It is common enough to think that an incorrect view is in fact correct. Having such a perverted view, one may then perform evil actions, supposing that such actions are really wholesome.

 

The writer thought of the Holy Inquisition when surely many priests sincerely believed that they were saving souls by burning bodies.

 

Thus perverted views are strengthened by wrong actions.

 

5. Sila-vrata-paramarsa—holding a false view regarding what is forbidden. This is falsely and unreasonably considering some things as forbidden, such as adhering only because of custom, convention, superstition, or blind faith. For instance, a man may keep cows, regarding them as divine, or chickens, believing that they are spirits. He does not eat their flesh, having the view that, as a result, he may be born in heaven. Another example of viewing a false cause as a real one is thinking that one may gain liberation by nakedness, by smearing oneself with ashes, or fasting for a long time. These are some examples of this sharp driver, whereby instead of heaven or liberation, harm to oneself can be the only result. Very often people who have firm faith in some false practice neglect the really wholesome spiritual factors, such as renunciation, morality, etc.

 

All five of these sharp drivers are corrupt knowledge and are not rooted out until one has obtained the third path, that of insight (darsana-marga). Neither the first (of accumulation) nor the second (of preparation) are sufficient to dislodge the sharp drivers.

 

D. Why the Four Mindfulnesses Stress Elimination of the Five Sharp Drivers

 

1. These four meditations contain the three Dharma-seals (tri-laksana: anitya, duhkha, anatman) and these distinguish Buddhism from other religions. To realize them requires very fine meditations, as they are subtle compared with the gross hindrances overcome in the last chapter. These three seals are extremely important.

 

It is also said that there are two forms of meditation: those within the three realms (karma, rupa, arupavacara), and those beyond them. It is our real purpose to practice the latter, for which a thorough grounding in the four mindfulnesses will be required. These four remove the sharp drivers and enable transcendental meditation to be attained.

 

2. The five dull drivers may be eliminated by the five meditations of the last chapter, so that only the sharp drivers remain to be cured by the medicines offered here.

 

3. The most important of the four is the last, concerned with the realization of the no-self of dharmas. Before we can arrive at this, the other three must have been practiced, thus finally removing the five sharp drivers.

 

E. The Practical Method of the Four Mindfulnesses

 

Two kinds of method can be distinguished. In one, the practice of the four proceeds separately; in the second, they are practiced together.

 

1. As Practiced Separately: The Practical Method

 

A stanza from the Kosa says:

 

"Upon what you have accomplished in samatha, base the practice of the four mindfulnesses and (not only practice them but) establish them firmly."

 

We should draw the reader's attention to this: it is essential to understand the importance of the foundations of mindfulness found in the preceding meditations; also, one must understand that these meditations are subtler than the former ones—there would be no need to practice them if they were not.

 

a. Samapatti of bodily impurity. I have classified this into four kinds:

 

i.                   The living body impurity of the thirty-six parts, twelve of which are outside the body, twelve composing the body itself, and twelve within:

 

Outside the Body

Of the Body Itself

Within the Body

hair on the head

dead outer skin

liver

hair on the body

growing inner skin

gall bladder

nails

blood

bowels

teeth

flesh

stomach

dirt found in the eyes

muscles

spleen

tears

nerves

kidneys

drool

bones

heart

spittle

marrow

lungs

excrement

fat

fresh food receptacle

urine

lymph

partially digested food receptacle

grease on the skin

brain

phlegm of the lungs

sweat

membranes

nasal mucous

 

 

We should meditate on all of these. But it is not enough for us to try to find our "self" in these impure matters; we should practice the other aspects of this meditation.

 

ii. The impurity of the dead body. This we have already discussed in the five meditations and, from the impurity meditations there, we should have gained both the will to renounce and the perception of impermanence.

 

iii. Impurity of perverted views about the body. One has the idea of "my" body or that this bodily contact "belongs to me." This means that ego is extended to other bodies over which we consider that we possess proprietary rights. We have ideas such as "my" wife, or, from the stimulus of bodily contact in kissing, of "my" girl. If this meditation is successful then the first of the sharp drivers (satkayadrsti) will be converted.

 

iv. Incomplete realization of impurity of the body. This refers to the partial realization of sunyata in the Hinayana when, with a spiritual body, one "touches" nirvana. This view in the Lesser Vehicle is incomplete, yet we shall soon see how to choose meditations from among its practices to act as a bridge to the Mahayana.

 

For our present consideration, the middle two are the most important, as the first has been dealt with, while the fourth is yet to come.

 

But in this chapter, for the sake of easy and tidy classification, we should make the four foundations become five to fit in with the five sharp drivers. This can be done without any distortion if breathing is considered as a mindfulness in conjunction with all the other four. Thus in this meditation, we breathe out, focusing our attention upon one of the thirty-six objects, and then breathe in regarding its specially repulsive character: breathing out, consider the hair on the head; breathing in, its greasiness, bad smell, dirtiness, etc. In this way we proceed through all the thirty-six objects one by one, breath by breath.

 

b. Every Feeling is Painful

 

i. This meditation is continuous in content from the merciful mind and having pity on others. Therefore in the first stage of this meditation, one should think only of the feeling of pain as mentioned in the Four Noble Truths.

 

ii. In addition to the above stage, the meditator should think: there are three kinds of feelings (pleasant, painful, and neither pleasant nor painful) but if all these are perceived as painful, then we shall recognize thoroughly that worldly pleasure ends with pain, and that the feeling of neither is a kind of ignorance. As a result we make progress and enter sunyata.

 

iii. Therefore, by taking others' painful feelings upon ourselves, we develop the Bodhi-heart. When we meditate on every feeling as sunyata, then spiritual and unchanging pleasure, the real feelings of the Buddhas, arises.

 

iv. With more progress, we come to the special pleasures of the Vajrayana, which are enlarged sixteenfold in the third initiation.

 

"We are talking here of Dharma beyond the pure Hinayana tradition," reminded the yogi, "so it will be helpful to understand these correspondences through our new diagram."

 

In correspondence with breathing: on the exhalation consider the cause or object of pain, and on the inhalation, the result of pain.

 

As pain and pleasure are opposite and one-sided views arise concerning either, if one meditates on them as empty, thus these views (antagraha) are converted.

 

c. The mind is impermanent. Of the mind in the past, nothing remains; it is already gone, and even if you want to pursue it, this is impossible as nothing can be found. Regarding the future mind, we have no idea what we shall think in time to come. Where will these minds come from? What will be their objects of thought? At present, no mind stays the same even for one moment; this has been the law in the past, is certainly so now, and there is no reason to doubt that it will continue so in the future. No real mind can be found which abides in any time.

 

Considering the mind first as an entity, we cannot find anything to call permanent or stable. If, on the other hand, we examine it under the three aspects of truth then:

 

i. Its essence (a source of its continued working) cannot be found.

 

ii. We cannot say of its quality whether it is red, green, round, square, sharp, blunt, large, small, rough, or smooth; whether joyful or sad, mind has no form.

 

iii. No specific function can be discovered, since this varies from time to time. From an angry mind, a person may act upon his anger. In this way people mind their minds. But if we take no notice of the mind, if we just say "never mind," then no function at all can be discerned.

 

We may also examine the mind in relation to the breath. When breathing out, we take a subject to investigate, and when breathing in, reach our conclusion upon it. On the exhalation, we may ask ourselves a question such as "What is this mind's function?" On the inhalation, give the answer: "No function can be apprehended."

 

If there is no mind at all, then the master of the perverse views (the "person" holding them) has no source at all, hence the sharp driver called mithya is dealt with.

 

d. All dharmas are without self. There are many kinds of non-self distinguished in the different schools of Buddhist thought.

 

i. One particularly taught in the Hinayana is anatman as escape. Many similes teach escape from the false idea of self and here we give five examples:

 

First: The master is asleep in his house when it catches fire at midnight. He thinks, "How shall I escape being burned alive?" Here the house is the self and escaping from it means not being burned in the fire of passions.

 

Second: A farmer whose ox has strayed away naturally wants to find out where it has gone. Still searching at nightfall, he finds an ox which he thinks belongs to him, but the next day discovers that it is the king's beast. Thinking, "I should get rid of this ox, or I may be accused of theft," he releases the animal and so escapes punishment. Here the ox is like the self mistakenly regarded as real, and letting go of it, one escapes the punishment of continued birth in samsara.

 

Third: This concerns a child. A woman inside her house hears a child crying in the street. Supposing it to be the sound of her own son, she runs out and brings the boy inside. Then she sees her mistake. "This is not my own child; it must be the neighbor's." So she quickly returns the boy to the street and so avoids punishment. In the same way people mistake something as belonging to them, as a "self," and should quickly give it up if they do not wish to experience painful results.

 

Fourth: A fisherman wants to catch a fish in a certain pool so he casts his net. After a time, he feels that the net is very heavy and may break if he tries to draw it out. He thinks, "I have a fine catch," and reaches down with his hand into the net, taking from it a large snake. He knows immediately: "This is very dangerous," and without more ado throws it away and escapes. In this way we fish for a self and find out that all we catch is a great danger. We should throw this away and escape.

 

Fifth: A man takes a wife whom he did not know was a half-ghoul and lives with her for many years. One night he wakes up to find his wife already leaving the house. He follows her until they reach a cemetery where he sees her eating the flesh of a corpse. He thinks to himself, "All these years I had no idea she was a non-human being. If I return to live with her again, one night she may feed on me." So he flees. For long we have identified something as a self but coming to recognize the danger therein, we should flee far away from such a false idea.

 

ii. Another idea of dharmas as selfless is contained in the doctrine of atoms or matter which cannot be split into anything finer. All beings and objects possessed of form, whether gross or subtle, were, according to this school, to be systematically analyzed into these atoms. Thus it was said that in those beings or objects, no self existed, but on the other hand these particles themselves were grasped at as though really existing. So while the followers of this school (Sarvastivada) had a means to rid themselves of ideas of the self, they still hung on the concept of a multiple reality and thus their teaching of sunyata was incomplete.

 

iii. By the process of analysis arriving at anatman. Two schools used this method but disagreed as to the nature of dharmas. The Sarvastivadins maintained anatman but taught also the existence of dharmas in the past, present, and future. There is no self in any dharma, they taught, but they did not examine the dharmas themselves to find out what they are.

 

The second school, Satyasiddhi, had the doctrine of the true idea of sunyata, retaining the concept of atoms and so arriving at their emptiness only by analysis.

 

In time as well as matter, it was taught that indivisible particles existed. In both cases, a residue of unbreakable parts, small though they were, was taught and thus such doctrines are really incomplete statements. For this reason, we take the meditations of the Hinayana but not its philosophical ideas.

 

Contrasting again these attitudes, Mr. Chen said:

 

The Hinayana always speak only of dharmas and these they accept as ultimately real, whereas the Mahayana sees this earth itself as without abiding entity; all the dharmas are empty. Even in our bodies there is no self. Buddhists are agreed about that but what about these things: noses and eyes, what is their true nature? The Hinayana seems to take up the self in the form of dharmas, into nirvana.

 

We will talk later of the standards of choice to apply in selecting meditations and philosophy in Buddhism. Therefore, when we meditate on this principle of the egolessness of dharmas, the student should follow the philosophy of the sunyata school: Breathing out touch the dharma (object); breathing in, think of sunyata. Thus the two remaining sharp drivers are altogether finished.

 

2. Why follow the above sequence?

 

Just because we have finished the five meditations in the last chapter, where the main ideas fostered were renunciation and impermanence, so first in this chapter we discuss the rough meditations on the body, for this seems nearest to us.

 

Then, because of the body's existence, comes the perverse idea of its beauty (subha). Dependent on this, we may experience loving feelings. With the consideration of the feelings, we have progressed a little inwards, for the body is "outside" compared with feelings. We should then think about the painful things and not love the body. If the body can be neither loved nor hated, then we demolish the second perverse view of seizing upon extremes (antagraha). This we should accomplish by truly knowing all feelings, both of love and hate, as sunyata.

 

Then Mr. Chen made a simile for the progression of body-mindfulness inwards:

 

It is as if one pursues a thief into the street. When he sees you after him, he hides in a house doorway (feelings mindfulness). When you pursue him further, he hides in a room inside the house. Thus we now come from mindfulness of feelings to mindfulness of the mind. As the mind is impermanentsometimes joyful and sometimes sad, so one should meditate on its impermanence.

 

Following this one should ask: who is the subject of mind? Here one pursues the thief into the inmost part of the house: philosophically, one mindfully regards the dharmas to find that in them, also, there is no self.

 

Centering upon mind and form with these four mindful meditations, nowhere is a self to be found. When the perverted views are thoroughly uprooted with one's mindfulness investigations, then this part of the process is finished. For these reasons, then, our sequence is as we have described, progressing from gross to subtle.

 

3. The Four Mindfulnesses as a Totality

 

What does this mean? To practice in this way, one combines these four into one meditation. In the Hinayana, a meditator who is very skilled in samatha would be able to meditate upon the smallest atom. Such is not our meaning here. Rather than be sidetracked by a mindful enquiry into these subtle particles, we should take them as sunyata and so rid ourselves of the five sharp drivers.

 

Taken in this aspect, the meditation on impurity is not only of the flesh, but concerns view as well. This is to be reduced by sunyata meditation. One is rid of the first sharp driver (the view of "my" body) thereby.

 

Why should we meditate on the sunyata of feeling? All feelings are usually grasped with the extreme view of them as pleasurable, painful, or neither. But really they are all sunyata. With this realization, the second sharp driver, the one-sided view, is destroyed.

 

Thirdly, regarding the mind as impermanent, what does this mean? Impermanence implies sunyata. When one knows the sunyata here, then the third sharp driver relating to cause and effect is swept away. Without meditating thus, the mind will always be looking for a source or a cause.

 

In the fourth meditation (on the dharmas) all the previous three are included. This we may call "total samapatti." The totality method which is described in some sastras but not taught by them as a bridge, is used by us in this way to go from the Hinayana meditations across to those of the Mahayana.

 

4. How to Meditate Diligently on These

 

We are advised by six similes on how to do this.

 

a. First: Just as a thirsty person always longs for water, so we should meditate that we may drink the ambrosia of sunyata to end cravings.

 

b. Second: Just as a hungry person craves only for food, in this way we should meditate to obtain spiritual food from our realization.

 

c. Third: Just as a person overcome by the heat desires a cool wind, so we should meditate that the heat of our desires lessens with the attainment of the cool of Nirvana.

 

d. Fourth: In the cold weather, a shivering person wants the sunshine to warm him or her in this way; we, devoid of wisdom, should meditate that the sun of wisdom may warm us.

 

e. Fifth: One who is in the darkness needs a lamp to see the way; so we who are in the darkness of ignorance should meditate that our Way becomes clear to us.

 

f. Sixth: A person suffering from the effects of poison requires some powerful antidote to cure him; in the same way, we should meditate as we suffer not from one poison but five and need the medicine given by the Buddha.

 

5. What Perversion Each Meditation Cures

 

Human beings always hold to the four inverted views, the first of which is impurity seen as purity. This is cured by the first of the mindful meditations and then in order follow: pleasure seen in pain (cured by the second meditation); permanence seen in impermanence (destroyed by the third meditation); and, lastly, a self seen where none exists (corrected by the fourth mindful meditation).

 

According to the Hinayana, usual human ways of thought are inverted, so they must first be turned right way up with, for instance, the samapatti on impermanence. Next comes the sublimation in the Mahayana teachings of Prajnaparamita and through the complete realization of sunyata, we can attain the unabiding nirvana (sometimes called "the true or great self"). This must be clearly distinguished from the higher self postulated in Hinduism and Theosophy, since the teachings of sunyata enabling a Buddhist to reach this nirvana do not exist in Hinduism (or indeed in any other religion). The Buddha only taught on the "true self" just before his parinirvana (in the Sanskrit version of the sutra of that name), as a skillful means to enlighten his followers. We also should not mistake the Buddhist and Hindu doctrines as the same. (See App. I, Part Two, A, 2.)

 

F. What Realization Can these Four Meditations Bring?

 

1. Main Realizations

 

a. The first is called "warmth" because as sticks rubbed together become warm, so these four meditations come near realization of the Four Noble Truths.

 

b. "Top" is second. Here the meditations arrive at the "top"; samapanna is touched at this time, but the mind is still liable to movement away from its objects. Sometimes the samapatti is settled, but at other times the mind wanders.

 

c. "Patience." The mind should always conform to the topmost attainment without moving. If it does not, then one's samatha is not yet strong enough to hold the samapatti without distraction arising, so at this time patience is needed. When attainment is confirmed, then, patience is well developed.

 

d. "The first in the world." When one attains this stage it is possible to touch a partial realization of sunyata. Such a one at that time is certainly first among all beings in the world.

 

2. Realizations Related to the Three Liberations (vimoksa)

 

If the first and third meditations are accomplished, then one will gain the signless liberation, because one does not seize the body as a gross outward sign nor grasp at the mind as a subtle inward sign. The result to be expected of the practice of the second meditation is the liberation of wishlessness, since one has concentrated upon the painfulness of feelings, so that pleasant sensations are seen for what they are and no attachment arises for them. Voidness is the liberation gained from the successful meditation on all dharmas as having no self.

 

3. Other Realizations

 

If one always meditates on the four mindfulness practices one will receive:

 

a. Increased faith in the Dharma;

b. Power to keep the sila very well;

c. Knowledge of the truth of impermanence;

d. A real renunciation;

e. Diligence to practice always and not to be like counterfeit Bodhisattvas going here and there; and

f. Increase of wisdom (the meditation on the dharmas' having no self particularly develops this).

 

G. Why among All the Hinayana Meditations Do We Take Only These Nine? How Are the Others Included in Them?

 

1. Let us first consider the thirty-seven Bodhi-branches (wings). All the factors among them may be reduced to only ten principles (this reclassification was made by the Dharma-master Vasubandhu in his very learned commentary on the Kosa called "the Buddha-upadesa sastra"). These ten are: mindfulness, tranquility, joy, equanimity, morality, investigation, diligence, wisdom, faith, and meditation.

 

Now having reduced these factors to their basic qualities, let us see how the nine meditations include them all:

 

mindfulness

the four mindful meditations themselves, particularly the third one

tranquility

samatha

joy

samatha

equanimity

samatha

morality

preliminary stages

investigation

samapatti

diligence

sub-realization

wisdom

sub-realization

faith

sub-realization

meditation

the meditation process itself

 

 

2. In the Abhidharma, a list of 40 meditations is given and these are also contained within our five plus four. The forty are:

 

10 kasinas or meditations on colors and elements—these are included within our resolution of the elements meditation;

10 impurity meditations (cemetery meditations)—included in different aspects of our nine, such as the exercises on the impurities and mindfulness of the body;

10 mindfulness of the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha (3 meditations)—included in preparatory chapters and refuge.

Mindfulness of morality (sila)—preparation

Mindfulness of giving (dana)—preparation

Mindfulness of the gods (deva)—in the Mahayana, apparently, instructions are only given to meditate upon the heavens, whereas the Hinayana is good in this respect, since if we remember the gods themselves they will give us some help. We have emphasized their importance in a chapter dedication;

Mindfulness of death—included in our impurity and impermanence meditations;

Mindfulness of the body (kaya)—included in our impurity and impermanence meditations;

Mindfulness of the breath—included in our impurity and impermanence meditations; and

Mindfulness of peace—realization in samatha.

10 Miscellaneous meditations for the development of the dhyanas:

4 divine abidings (brahma-vihara): two (maitri, karuna) included among the five meditations, but the others to be considered later;

4 formless realms (arupa dhyanas): as these are found in other religions, they have been left aside;

Repulsiveness of food: preparation;

Discrimination of the elements: the third of the five meditations.

 

H. Why Will the Mindful Meditations Be a Bridge Across to the Mahayana?

 

1. This is so because the four mindful meditations gather into themselves all the merits from the practice of the five Hinayana meditations of the last chapter:

 

a. The body is impure—merit from the practice of the first of the five;

b. All feelings are painful—this includes the attainment of pity on others;

c. The mind is impermanent—all the merits gathered from meditation on dependent origination; and

d. All dharmas are without self—gathers the merits from element discrimination.

 

As these four mindfulnesses are always used in conjunction with the breath, so the bridge is now complete and we may cross over.

 

We have now passed across to consider the Mahayana meditations. Many classifications of sunyata exist, but I have selected these four where the correspondence with the four mindfulnesses is both close and striking:

 

a. From the body's impurity, we go to the sunyata of self;

b. "Feelings are painful" corresponds to the sunyata of others;

c. "Mind is impermanent" aligns with non-dharma sunyata;

d. "Dharmas' having no self" to the dharmalaksana sunyata.

 

These connections are not contrived, for there is a true and easily seen correspondence. With our diagram this may be clearer. For these reasons we can say that the mindful meditations truly form a good bridge (for these see Ch. X, Part One, D, 1, c and Part Two, A, 4).

 

I. How Do They Correspond with the Vajrayana?

 

The correspondence here is of two kinds: with the lower three yogas as taught in Japan , and with the anuttara yoga practiced in Tibet .

 

1. With the Japanese Tantra

 

Bodily impurity is in the human body. In the practice of meditation, the human body ceases to be experienced by the meditator who attains success in samatha in the dhyanas. One does not cling to the human body, and when it is meditated away, the thought of its impurity also vanishes. What remains is a pure heavenly body. Then this body has to be subjected to the process of sunyata sublimation in the Mahayana teachings. After this, no impurity remains either in flesh or in spirit and the veils of sorrow and of knowledge are both gone. All impurity, gross and subtle, is thus destroyed. In this complete process through the three yanas, the Hinayana is in the position of cause, Mahayana is the sublimation-cause, and the position of consequence is held by the Vajrayana, when the pure body is transformed into a Buddha-body.

 

For the whole system, then, the first two yanas may be considered as causal, while the Vajrayana is of consequence, where everything belongs to Buddhahood.

 

I must emphasize to the readers that they should pay much attention to the two yanas of cause: To Hinayana purification and Mahayana sublimation, for without a firm basis of the practice of their teachings, there can be no possibility of true attainment in Vajrayana. Without the first two yanas, the third one becomes merely a matter of empty rituals and meaningless mumblings.

 

This latter is the "Vajrayana" of bad lamas who eat and drink heedlessly, marry for pleasure, and who have little idea of the meaning of what they teach, let alone any idea of practicing it. They should learn from the example of our Lord Buddha, who preached and practiced all three vehicles in his life. If the first two vehicles are not important (as some "tantric" teachers suggest) then why did the Buddha teach them? Why did he not directly preach the Vajrayana without the other two? Out of all the thousand Buddhas in this "auspicious aeon (Bhadra-kalpa)," only two preach the Vajrayana. One of these was Sakyamuni and the other will be the Buddha to come after Maitreya (to be called Simhanada and now taking Bodhisattva birth as the Guru Karmapa). Only two out of a thousand Buddhas care to give the Vajrayana teachings to the world; the others regard it as too difficult for people to understand and liable to mislead the foolish.

 

But there is no contradiction between these yanas, as some suppose, the truth being that each one helps the next; therefore, not one of them can be left out from our practice. Je Tsong-khapa, to whom we have paid our homage, knew well enough the importance of purification, an emphasis which many tantric teachers ignore.

 

Then, Mr. Chen said very earnestly:

 

If one wants to realize the Vajrayana, then one must first practice the purification in the Hinayana.

 

Mr. Chen laughed, saying:

 

Lamas marry; which body do they use? It is plain to see that since so many children result, it must be the body of flesh. If one practices the Hinayana meditations of purification, then through dhyana one may acquire a heavenly, or refined, body. After the sublimation by sunyata in Mahayana, the flesh-body is completely transformed into a wisdom-body, while by the Vajrayana practices this is transmuted into the diamond body of a Buddha. How then can a Vajrayanist marry for the usual purposes and have children in the normal manner? Such is impossible for those who have passed through all the purification processes.

 

After these preliminary and general remarks, Mr. Chen went on to answer the question in the heading of this section, showing the relationship between the four mindful practices and the Japanese Vajrayana doctrines.

 

a. First mindfulness

 

In Japanese Tantra there are five progressive forms of the Buddha-body which correspond with the mindfulness of the body.

 

b. Second mindfulness

 

After purification and sublimation of feeling, then according to the third yoga practice, the sixteen goddesses will come and make their offerings of rich and costly things to the Buddha. At the time of practicing this yogic teaching, feelings arise and, from the nature of the goddesses and their gifts, these are certainly not painful, but are truly pleasurable.

 

c. Third mindfulness

 

The teaching of the Vajra-mind corresponds to the mindfulness of mind. For its attainment, practice with both mantra and mudra is required.

 

d. Fourth mindfulness

 

The correspondence here is with the six element yoga practices.

 

All these techniques will be described later (Ch. XII).

 

2. Correspondences with Tibetan Tantra

 

a. First: in the anuttara-yoga, the body is visualized as the Buddha first in the growing stage (utpatti-krama), where everything from the feet to the head is growing into sunyata, so that every part of the body is taken into Buddhahood. In the second stage, that of perfection (sampanna-krama), all conditional parts of the energy and the entity of sunyata are identified in the perfected wisdom of Buddhahood.

 

b. Second: practicing the meditation of tummo will result in always feeling some ultimate joy in the Buddha-body.

 

c. Third: the third mindfulness corresponds with the transformation of the mind into the light of wisdom.

 

d. Fourth: the fourth meditation has its correspondence when all dharmas are sublimated and become the mandala of the Buddha.

 

The group above only corresponds with the first and second initiations of the anuttara-yoga. Taking the third initiation into account as well, the four voidnesses and the four blisses should be added to correspond with the mindful meditations. (See Ch. XIII, Part Two, Chart.)

 

3. Breathing Meditations

 

"We seem," said Mr. Chen, "to have left aside the breathing meditations."

 

In the yanas of cause, breath concentration is only an aid to samatha, but in the yana of consequence, the Vajrayana, breath occupies an even more important place than mind. Why? In the exoteric yanas' doctrine, the training of the mind is always mentioned, and the energy (especially bodily energy) is neglected. In the Vajrayana, however, both are important, especially the aspect of energy. Why? In rebirth within the six realms the eighth consciousness (alaya-vijnana) appears to be the master. But what transports this consciousness? How can it move? The answer is that movement takes place by means of the subtle life energy which is bound up with the consciousness and cannot be easily separated. All the innate or natural sorrow (sahaja-klesa) is caused by this energy. (Note: this is purely a Vajrayana explanation, and nothing is said about it in the exoteric yanas.)

 

How does this natural sorrow originate? It comes from the presence of avidya itself, which has been with us since beginningless time. It has always been with us, is difficult to destroy, and is held on to by the eight consciousnesses. But in the Vajrayana, there are some methods in the position of consequence (Buddhahood), to transmute these natural sorrows and false views by the practice of wisdom-energy. Therefore, in the Vajrayana, it is easy to get enlightenment in this life. It is for this reason that so many methods concern the breath. One may find these in our chapters on the Vajrayana.

 

"If we were to enumerate and explain all the breathing doctrines," said Mr. Chen smiling, "we would not be able to finish them tonight!"

 

In the Hinayana, detailed instructions for breathing practices give fifteen methods. However, although these are good on their own level, they do not even have the slightest flavor of the Vajrayana. Mindful breathing in the Hinayana progresses by way of the following stages:

 

Long breathing in and out

Short breathing in and out

Experiencing the whole body through inhalation and exhalation

Tranquilizing the bodily form

Experiencing happiness

Experiencing bliss

Experiencing mental formations (samskara)

Tranquilizing mental formations

Experiencing consciousness

Gladdening consciousness

Concentrating consciousness

Liberating consciousness

Contemplating cessation

Contemplating relinquishment

Contemplating impermanence

 

All these breathing meditations only lead one to partial attainment and, we may note, they say nothing about complete sunyata. This, however, we shall know well after studying the Vajrayana meditations on breathing.

 

One of the Tian Tai lists may also be given here for comparison (we have already mentioned these sixteen excellences in Chapter III):

 

Know breathing in

Know breathing out

Know whether the breath is long or short

Know the breath pervading the whole body

Get rid of breath-movements in the body

Experience some happiness

Experience some bliss

Experience good mental feelings

The mind generates some happiness

The mind draws inside itself, becoming concentrated

The mind experiences some liberations

Samapatti on impermanence

Samapatti on renunciation

Samapatti on nonattachment

Samapatti on distinguishing the Four Noble Truths

Samapatti on thorough and perfect renunciation

 

J. Does the Vajrayana Also Include the Hinayana Doctrines?

 

The answer is yes, definitely yes. In the Tibetan Vajrayana schools, many books and ritual instructions mention the four outward foundations, and these are all taken from the Hinayana. They are:

 

1. That enough leisure for study and practice as well as a perfect body are both very difficult to obtain. Here there is a correspondence with the mindfulness of the body.

 

2. To remember death, which comes at no certain time. This foundation connects well with the meditations on death and impermanence.

 

3. That causality is inexorable: "As a man sows, so shall he reap." The meditations on dependent origination are connected here.

 

4. That in samsara, only pain is experienced: The correspondence with the Four Noble Truths and mindfulness of feeling is plain to see.

 

I am very sorry to note, however, that for most tantric rituals and doctrines, there is only talk of the necessary preliminary practice of the exoteric yanas and very little practice of them. Too many Vajrayana gurus are inclined in this way; they talk too much and practice too little. They could well learn from the Hinayana where practice is that while many scholars are seen, there are few sages now. If the Vajrayana laid more stress upon these four foundations and the meditations connected with them, then it would be much easier for people to gain realization in the disciplines of the Diamond Way .

 

There is a proverb in Tibet that says:

 

"Among any ten sages,

Nine belong to Taklung-kagyu;

And of these ten sages,

Nine out of ten are poor."

 

This points out to us that the great majority of those who truly have realization in the Vajrayana practice the renunciation and voluntary poverty advocated in the Hinayana. Here indeed is the Hinayana in the Vajrayana.

 

K. What Are the Criteria for Choosing Meditations from among the Three Yanas?

 

Meditators should understand clearly why we have taken some meditations and left others in our system of three-yanas-in-one.

 

1. Whatever we take from the lower yanas must be found in developed form in the higher ones. This is not merely my own idea but is based upon the authority of ancient sages.

 

2. There should be no conflict of philosophy between the lower and the higher. We should select those philosophic teachings which lead us on from yana to yana. Thus in the Hinayana we appreciate highly the teaching of the Four Noble Truths but we must put aside the incomplete Hinayana exposition of sunyata and nirvana. That is, in the lower there must be something of value for the understanding of the higher.

 

3. Regarding final truth, we should rely upon the teaching of the highest yanathe Vajrayana.

 

4. For the preliminary foundations, it is proper to take them from the Hinayana.

 

5. According to our three "C"s, we only take teachings from the former two of cause and course, which will lead us onward to the third one, that of consequence (Vajrayana).

 

6. Though we take our doctrines from separate yanas, still our whole scheme of three-yanas-in-one is systematized in a natural sequence and is not according to any sectarian bias.

 

Concluding, Mr. Chen remarked:

 

Some people may want to use the various Buddhist doctrines in their own way. They might first consider our system, try it out and see how it works, and then they may change their minds. In any case, whatever systematizing is attempted, I advise those who would do this work to base it on the above six criteria.

 

Our work deals with the whole system of the three yanas; here we have only begun with an outline of the nine meditations and all the correspondences with the Mahayana and Vajrayana follow after. For this reason, no summary is made at the end of this chapter.

 

I most humbly say that this is not the only systematic way and surely there will be others who will do this work quite as well, if not better, than I have tried to do here.

 

Then said the yogi: "Nine o'clock." The writer counted the newly covered pages in his notebook: Sixteen, this evening. And he thought: "Sixteen pages of scrawled hieroglyphics to decipher and to convert into another chapter...."

 

May it be for the increased mindfulness and consequent happiness of all who read it!

[Home][Back to main list][Back to Table of Contest list][Chinese versions][Next Chapter ][Go to Dr. Lin's works]